Santor v. U.S. Bank National Association

Hawaii Supreme Court

Santor v. U.S. Bank National Association

DecidedMay 17, 2010

Docket30481

StatusPublished

This text of Santor v. U.S. Bank National Association (Santor v. U.S. Bank National Association) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santor v. U.S. Bank National Association, (haw 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

LAW L|BRARY

NO. 30481 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

CONSTANCE LOUISE SANTOR, PetitiOner,

VS.

BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS TRUSTEE, ON BEHAL§NOF THE HOLDERS OF THE HOME EQUITY ASSET TRUST 2006-3 HOME §QUITY §§ 43

U.S. PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3; LAW FL§§ OF LESTER LEU; PROCESS § §§?R

LEU & OKUDA; KARYN A. DOIi RICHARD ALCOMINDRAS; DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY DIR

?Y.§"?L_,:i

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ORDER and Recktenwald,

Acoba, Duffy,

(By: Moon, C.J., Nakayama, Upon consideration of the petition filed in the supreme it appears that we

court by petitioner Constance Louise Santor,

lack jurisdiction to conduct a de novo review of petitioner’s 2009). Therefore,

qrievances. See HRS § 602-5 (Supp. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition is dismissed.

May 17, 2010.

DATED: Honolulu, HawaiUq

?%LuAv~f5FTMu45QJj@Lp@c

/6‘-

QL-£.Dw%Qa9\' “` /KQ¢4¢~é?\ /QkL¢QFL4u/¢£¢/

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI