Santo-Perez v. Enterprise Leasing Co.
This text of 126 A.D.3d 621 (Santo-Perez v. Enterprise Leasing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth L. Thompson, Jr., J.), entered on or about November 19, 2013, which granted defendant Anthony A. Hill’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and the motion denied.
While the fact that plaintiff was crossing the street on foot outside of the crosswalk, in violation of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1152 (a), is evidence of negligence on his part, the record presents a triable issue of fact whether defendant Hill, operating a vehicle, contributed to the accident by failing to exercise due care to avoid a collision with plaintiff. Indeed, Hill testified that he saw plaintiff before the collision and had time to activate his horn and move his vehicle to the double line before reducing his speed by half (see Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1146; Ryan v Budget Rent a Car, 37 AD3d 698 [2d Dept 2007]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
126 A.D.3d 621, 3 N.Y.S.3d 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santo-perez-v-enterprise-leasing-co-nyappdiv-2015.