Santini Bros. v. Smith
This text of 250 A.D. 53 (Santini Bros. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The stipulation is enforcible but its meaning is sufficiently ambiguous to require the taking of oral proof of the surrounding facts and circumstances to determine the true meaning and intention of the parties.
The order appealed from entered December 4, 1936, should be reversed and the matter remitted to an official referee to take testimony and report to the Special Term, disposition of the motion to be held in abeyance until the coming in of the referee’s report. The order denying motion for resettlement should be affirmed.
■ Present — Martin, P. J., McAvoy, O’Malley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.
Order entered December 4, 1936, unanimously reversed and the matter remitted to an official referee to take testimony and report . to the Special Term, disposition of the motion to be held in abeyance until the coming in of the referee’s report. Order denying motion for resettlement unanimously affirmed.
Settle order on notice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
250 A.D. 53, 293 N.Y.S. 765, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santini-bros-v-smith-nyappdiv-1937.