Santillo v. Santillo

2017 NY Slip Op 8156
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santillo v. Santillo. Read the opinion of the Court — 155 A.D.3d 1688
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 17, 2017·No. 1354 CA 17-00292·Published

Opinion

Santillo v Santillo (2017 NY Slip Op 08156)
Santillo v Santillo
2017 NY Slip Op 08156
Decided on November 17, 2017
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on November 17, 2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., PERADOTTO, DEJOSEPH, NEMOYER, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

1354 CA 17-00292

[*1]CAROL A. SANTILLO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

THOMAS J. SANTILLO, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)


OSBORN, REED & BURKE, LLP, ROCHESTER (JEFFREY L. TURNER OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

BILGORE, REICH & KANTOR, LLP, ROCHESTER (THEODORE S. KANTOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.



Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (James J. Piampiano, J.), entered November 7, 2016. The order denied defendant's motion for, inter alia, leave to renew his prior motion to vacate the qualified domestic relations order entered in February 1996.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Santillo v Santillo ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 17, 2017]).

Entered: November 17, 2017

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santillo v. Santillo, 2017 NY Slip Op 8156 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 8156 (Santillo v. Santillo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431