Santiesteban v. Okeelanta Corp.

688 So. 2d 1, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1361, 1997 WL 68047
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 20, 1997·No. No. 96-1161·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The amended order entered by the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) in this ease properly awarded certain periods of wage loss to Appellant Gilberto Santiesteban. Because appellant was on notice that his doctors had placed him at maximum medical improvement, the JCC did not err in adjudi-[2] eating the wage loss claims. Turner v. Rinker Materials, 622 So.2d 80 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Dailey v. General Accounting Machines, 411 So.2d 1030 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Also the JCC properly followed Winn Dixie v. Resnikoff, 659 So.2d. 1297 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) in which this court recognized that “the eligibility schedule [for wage loss] under section 440.15(3)(b)4.d. applies only as a cumulative limitation on the total number of weeks for which the claimant may be entitled to wage loss benefits.”

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, C.J., and ERVIN and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santiesteban v. Okeelanta Corp., 688 So. 2d 1, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 1361, 1997 WL 68047 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

688 So. 2d 1 (Santiesteban v. Okeelanta Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Rinker Materials
622 So. 2d 80 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Dailey v. General Accounting Machines
411 So. 2d 1030 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)