Santibenez v. Dixon
This text of Santibenez v. Dixon (Santibenez v. Dixon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
No. 1D2023-2818 _____________________________
LUIS SANTIBANEZ,
Appellant,
v.
RICKY D. DIXON, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections,
Appellee. _____________________________
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. Angela C. Dempsey, Judge.
May 14, 2025
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See Ivory v. State, 299 So. 3d 1178 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that a prisoner serving a life sentence cannot show a liberty interest implicated by disciplinary action resulting in disciplinary confinement); John v. Crews, 149 So. 3d 149 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (affirming dismissal of petition for writ of mandamus to review prison disciplinary proceedings; appellant serving life sentence had no constitutionally protected liberty interest at stake).
LEWIS, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________
Luis Santibanez, pro se, Appellant.
Dan A. Johnson, General Counsel, and Declan R. Duffy, Senior Assistant General Counsel, Florida Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santibenez v. Dixon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santibenez-v-dixon-fladistctapp-2025.