Santiago v. VIG Corp.

201 A.D.2d 337, 607 N.Y.S.2d 40
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 10, 1994
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 201 A.D.2d 337 (Santiago v. VIG Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. VIG Corp., 201 A.D.2d 337, 607 N.Y.S.2d 40 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Howard Silver, J.), entered January 28, 1993, which granted defendants’ motions for summary judgment dismissing this personal injury action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The infant plaintiff was injured when a piece of glass pierced the garbage bag she was carrying that was filled with debris defendants had negligently left in her grandmother’s apartment. In view of the grandmother’s admission that after cleaning up the debris and asking plaintiff to carry the bag, she failed to inform plaintiff that the opaque garbage bag concealed dangerous materials, the court properly found the grandmother’s actions to have so attenuated defendants’ negligence from the ultimate injury as to make it unreasonable to attribute to defendants any responsibility for the injury (compare, Shutak v Handler, 190 AD2d 345). No reasonable jury could find that the grandmother’s failure to warn was a normal or foreseeable consequence of the conceded hazardous situation created by defendants (see, supra, at 347). Concur— Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lux v. R & R Mobile Home Park, Inc.
291 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Stephenson v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
168 Misc. 2d 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
201 A.D.2d 337, 607 N.Y.S.2d 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-vig-corp-nyappdiv-1994.