Santiago v. State
128 So. 3d 942, 2013 WL 6821481, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20374
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santiago v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 14982 →
Opinion
The appellant argues that the trial court erred in reducing his jail credit for time served after the original sentencing hearing. The State concedes that the trial court erred. See Davis v. State, 63 So.3d 847 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (“[Jjail credit cannot be rescinded after it has been awarded, even if the credit was awarded in error.”). Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for entry of a judgment and sentence reflecting the original award of jail credit for time served.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santiago v. State, 128 So. 3d 942, 2013 WL 6821481, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 20374 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).
128 So. 3d 942 (Santiago v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
63 So. 3d 847 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)