Santiago v. Southern Pacific Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santiago v. Southern Pacific Co.

163 A.D. 876, 147 N.Y.S. 1139, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 876 (Santiago v. Southern Pacific Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santiago v. Southern Pacific Co., 163 A.D. 876, 147 N.Y.S. 1139, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

We think that the evidence failed to sustain a finding by the jury that the defendant was negligent. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. . Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

We think that the evidence failed to sustain a finding by the jury that the defendant was negligent. The judgment and order appealed from are, therefore, reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event. Present—Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Clarke, Scott and Hotchkiss, JJ. Judgment and order reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event. . Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 876, 147 N.Y.S. 1139, 1914 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-southern-pacific-co-nyappdiv-1914.