Santiago v. Robles
31 P.R. 911
Opinion
District Court of San Juan, Section 2.
Execution of deed.
It appearing from appellee’s motion and from the certificate attached that the appeal was taken on March 15, 1921, and that although some extensions were granted for preparing the transcript of the evidence, the first of them was asked for when the time had expired therefor and the transcript not having been filed in this court, the motion is sustained and the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santiago v. Robles, 31 P.R. 911 (prsupreme 1923).
31 P.R. 911 (Santiago v. Robles) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.