Santiago v. Riley

100 A.D.3d 764, 953 N.Y.S.2d 867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santiago v. Riley. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 A.D.3d 1045

Opinion

In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Stack, J.H.O.), dated February 4, 2011, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court properly dismissed this proceeding, since a custody proceeding between these parties is pending in Delaware (see Domestic Relations Law § 75-a [7]; Matter of Navarrete v Wyatt, 52 AD3d 836 [2008]), and the exercise of temporary emergency jurisdiction in New York is not warranted (see Domestic Relations Law § 76-c [1]; Matter of Scott v Jackson, 38 AD3d 788 [2007]).

The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Angiolillo, J.E, Austin, Sgroi and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santiago v. Riley, 100 A.D.3d 764, 953 N.Y.S.2d 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

100 A.D.3d 764 (Santiago v. Riley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. Jackson
38 A.D.3d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Navarrete v. Wyatt
52 A.D.3d 836 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)