Home/New York Court of Appeals/Santiago v. New York City Housing Authority

Santiago v. New York City Housing Authority

469 N.E.2d 839, 63 N.Y.2d 761, 480 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4559
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 20, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by41 cases

This text of 469 N.E.2d 839 (Santiago v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. New York City Housing Authority, 469 N.E.2d 839, 63 N.Y.2d 761, 480 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4559 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

The negligence of defendant New York City Housing Authority in not repairing a “jammed” exterior door is not a proximate, or legal cause of the injuries sustained by the plaintiff when she was shot in the leg after being unable to open the exterior door in attempting to reenter her build[763]*763ing. Under these circumstances the intervening act of the unknown assailant was extraordinary and unforeseeable as a matter of law, and thus served to “break the causal connection” between the defendant’s negligence and the plaintiff’s injuries (Derdiarian v Felix Contr. Corp., 51 NY2d 308, 315). To hold the shooting incident a foreseeable consequence of the defendant’s negligence would “stretch the concept of foreseeability beyond acceptable limits” (Ventricelli v Kinney System Rent A Car, 45 NY2d 950, 952).

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs, in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barone v. Liberty Cab Co.
2024 NY Slip Op 02403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
Timoshenko v. Airport Auto Group, Inc.
95 A.D.3d 1299 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Travelers Indemnity Co. of America v. More Buying Power, Inc.
67 A.D.3d 1000 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Ingrassia v. Lividikos
54 A.D.3d 721 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Zambrana v. New York City Transit Authority
14 A.D.3d 23 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Taylor v. Bedford Check Cashing Corp.
8 A.D.3d 657 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Buckeridge v. Broadie
5 A.D.3d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
Miecznikowski v. Robida
278 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Dlugach v. 6220 Bay Realty Corp.
277 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Rodriguez v. Pro Cable Services Co. Limited Partnership
266 A.D.2d 894 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)
Cook v. New York City Housing Authority
248 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Levine v. Fifth Housing Co.
242 A.D.2d 564 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Suarez v. Longwood Associates
239 A.D.2d 250 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Goodman v. General Motors Cororation
235 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Howard-Seay v. Dorchester Towers Associates
227 A.D.2d 525 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Ventura v. Structural Concrete Corp.
227 A.D.2d 235 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Dillman v. Bohemian Citizens Benevolent Society of Astoria, Inc.
227 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Stephenson v. S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc.
168 Misc. 2d 528 (New York Supreme Court, 1996)
Curry v. Baisley Park Associates
162 Misc. 2d 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1994)
Allen v. New York City Housing Authority
203 A.D.2d 313 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 N.E.2d 839, 63 N.Y.2d 761, 480 N.Y.S.2d 321, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4559, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-ny-1984.