Santiago v. Ibrahim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santiago v. Ibrahim

21 A.D.3d 565, 799 N.Y.S.2d 902

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 22, 2005

StatusPublished

This text of 21 A.D.3d 565 (Santiago v. Ibrahim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santiago v. Ibrahim, 21 A.D.3d 565, 799 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated April 22, 2004, which denied her petition to modify an order of visitation of the same court dated December 3, 2002. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.

The order appealed from was rendered academic by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J), dated May 21, 2004. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J.), dated April 22, 2004, which denied her petition to modify an order of visitation of the same court dated December 3, 2002. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), in which he moves to be relieved of the assignment to prosecute this appeal.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements; and it is further,

Ordered that the counsel’s application to withdraw as counsel is dismissed as academic.

The order appealed from was rendered academic by a subsequent order of the Family Court, Queens County (DePhillips, J), dated May 21, 2004. Florio, J.P., Krausman, Crane, Rivera and Fisher, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 A.D.3d 565, 799 N.Y.S.2d 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-ibrahim-nyappdiv-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack