Santiago v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santiago v. Goord

27 A.D.3d 290, 812 N.Y.S.2d 324

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 16, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 27 A.D.3d 290 (Santiago v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santiago v. Goord, 27 A.D.3d 290, 812 N.Y.S.2d 324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered December 14, 2004, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination of petitioner’s jail-time credit, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is barred by res judicata, petitioner’s claims herein arising out of the same transaction as those he raised in Matter of Santiago v Brown (Sup Ct, Orleans County, Oct. 2, 2003, Punch, J., Index No. 03-29063; see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]), namely, the calculation by respondent New York City Department of Correction of his jail-time credit for the periods March 31, 1996 to July 3, 1996 and February 26, 1998 to January 28, 2000. In any event, on the merits, with respect to the first period, contrary to petitioner’s claim, he was in fact given credit, and, with respect to the second period, he is not entitled to a credit since the same time was credited against the federal sentence he was then serving. Fetitioner’s state sentence did not commence until September [291]*29113, 2002, when he completed his federal sentence (see Penal Law § 70.30 [3]; Matter of Kalamis v Smith, 42 NY2d 191, 197-198 [1977]; cf. 18 USC § 3585 [b]; United States v Smith, 812 F Supp 368, 371, 374 [ED NY 1993]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Edmead, J.), entered December 14, 2004, which denied petitioner’s application to annul respondents’ determination of petitioner’s jail-time credit, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The proceeding is barred by res judicata, petitioner’s claims herein arising out of the same transaction as those he raised in Matter of Santiago v Brown (Sup Ct, Orleans County, Oct. 2, 2003, Punch, J., Index No. 03-29063; see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 [1981]), namely, the calculation by respondent New York City Department of Correction of his jail-time credit for the periods March 31, 1996 to July 3, 1996 and February 26, 1998 to January 28, 2000. In any event, on the merits, with respect to the first period, contrary to petitioner’s claim, he was in fact given credit, and, with respect to the second period, he is not entitled to a credit since the same time was credited against the federal sentence he was then serving. Fetitioner’s state sentence did not commence until September [291]*29113, 2002, when he completed his federal sentence (see Penal Law § 70.30 [3]; Matter of Kalamis v Smith, 42 NY2d 191, 197-198 [1977]; cf. 18 USC § 3585 [b]; United States v Smith, 812 F Supp 368, 371, 374 [ED NY 1993]). Concur—Buckley, P.J., Mazzarelli, Marlow, Sullivan and Sweeny, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 A.D.3d 290, 812 N.Y.S.2d 324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-goord-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack