Santiago v. City of New York
This text of 71 A.D.3d 468 (Santiago v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2009, which granted defendants-respondents’ [469]*469motions pursuant to CPLR 3126 dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The complaint was properly dismissed for persistent, unexplained noncompliance with four disclosure orders, including a self-executing conditional order of dismissal that was granted on default and became absolute (see AWL Indus., Inc. v QBE Ins. Corp., 65 AD3d 904 [2009]; Min Yoon v Costello, 29 AD3d 407 [2006]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Sweeny, Nardelli and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 A.D.3d 468, 894 N.Y.S.2d 873, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-2010.