Santiago v. City of New York

219 A.D.2d 493, 631 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9262
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 14, 1995
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D.2d 493 (Santiago v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. City of New York, 219 A.D.2d 493, 631 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9262 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas McKeon, J.), entered July 11, 1994, which denied petitioner’s renewed application for leave to serve a late notice of claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In light of the failure to adequately explain the delay and the absence of actual notice to respondents, the court’s denial of petitioner’s application was not an abuse of discretion. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
219 A.D.2d 493, 631 N.Y.S.2d 515, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1995.