Santiago v. Bristol

735 N.E.2d 1286, 95 N.Y.2d 848, 713 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1787
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 6, 2000·Published

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal denied. The Court of Appeals restates the rule that denial of a motion for leave to appeal is not equivalent to an affirmance and has no precedential value (see, e.g., Matter of Marchant v Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 252 NY 284, 297-298).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santiago v. Bristol, 735 N.E.2d 1286, 95 N.Y.2d 848, 713 N.Y.S.2d 520, 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 1787 (N.Y. 2000).

735 N.E.2d 1286 (Santiago v. Bristol) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.
169 N.E. 386 (New York Court of Appeals, 1929)