Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co.

176 N.E.2d 835, 10 N.Y.2d 718
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 9, 1961
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 176 N.E.2d 835 (Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co., 176 N.E.2d 835, 10 N.Y.2d 718 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

In each action: Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bulis v. Di Lorenzo
142 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Reed Tool Co. v. Copelin
689 S.W.2d 404 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)
Jones v. VIP Development Co.
472 N.E.2d 1046 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
Bardere v. Zafir
102 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co.
92 A.D.2d 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Houston v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.
522 F. Supp. 1094 (District of Columbia, 1981)
Werner v. State of New York
424 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Kittell v. Vermont Weatherboard, Inc.
417 A.2d 926 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1980)
Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.
354 N.E.2d 553 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 N.E.2d 835, 10 N.Y.2d 718, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-v-brill-monfort-co-ny-1961.