Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co.
176 N.E.2d 835, 10 N.Y.2d 718
Opinion
In each action: Judgment affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co., 176 N.E.2d 835, 10 N.Y.2d 718 (N.Y. 1961).
176 N.E.2d 835 (Santiago v. Brill Monfort Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bulis v. Di Lorenzo
142 A.D.2d 707 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Reed Tool Co. v. Copelin
689 S.W.2d 404 (Texas Supreme Court, 1985)
Jones v. VIP Development Co.
472 N.E.2d 1046 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1984)
Bardere v. Zafir
102 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co.
92 A.D.2d 110 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
Houston v. Bechtel Associates Professional Corp.
522 F. Supp. 1094 (District of Columbia, 1981)
Werner v. State of New York
424 N.E.2d 541 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
Kittell v. Vermont Weatherboard, Inc.
417 A.2d 926 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1980)
Rosales v. Verson Allsteel Press Co.
354 N.E.2d 553 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1976)