SANTIAGO MARTINEZ v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

SANTIAGO MARTINEZ v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 13, 2019

Docket17-4817

StatusPublished

This text of SANTIAGO MARTINEZ v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. (SANTIAGO MARTINEZ v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SANTIAGO MARTINEZ v. MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

SANTIAGO MARTINEZ and CYNTHIA ) MARTINEZ, ) ) Appellants, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-4817 ) PAT FRANK, as Clerk of the Circuit Court ) for Hillsborough County; MORTGAGE ) ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION ) SYSTEMS, INC.; Q LENDING, INC. f/k/a ) Equity Financial Group, Inc.; and ) RENAISSANCE VILLAS CONDO ASSN. ) INC., ) ) Appellees. ) )

Opinion filed February 13, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County; Paul L. Huey, Judge.

Arthur S. Barksdale, IV and Philip D. Storey of Alvarez, Winthrop, Thompson & Storey, P.A., Orlando, for Appellants.

David M. Caldevilla of de la Parte & Gilbert, P.A., Tampa; Dale K. Bohner, General Counsel, Tampa; and Shelby K. Russ, Staff Attorney, Tampa, for Appellee Pat Frank, as Clerk of the Circuit Court for Hillsborough County.

No appearance for remaining Appellees. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., and CASE, JAMES R., ASSOCIATE SENIOR JUDGE, Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI