Santiago, M. Pets. v. OAG
This text of Santiago, M. Pets. v. OAG (Santiago, M. Pets. v. OAG) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
MICHAEL SANTIAGO, CURTIS : No. 143 MM 2023 MAHAFFEY, AND CORDELL YOUNG, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL AND : YORK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY : OFFICE, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 25th day of March, 2024, the “Application for the Court to Invoke
Jurisdiction Based on King’s Bench” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santiago, M. Pets. v. OAG, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-m-pets-v-oag-pa-2024.