Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedNovember 1, 2023
Docket2:23-cv-03172
StatusUnknown

This text of Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. (Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C., (C.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 SCOTT J. LEIPZIG (BAR NO. 192005) E-Mail: sleipzig@allenmatkins.com 2 ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 3 865 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800 Los Angeles, California 90017-2543 4 Phone: (213) 622-5555 Fax: (213) 620-8816 5 ADAM B. KORN (BAR NO. 331133) 6 E-Mail: akorn@allenmatkins.com ALLEN MATKINS LECK GAMBLE 7 MALLORY & NATSIS LLP 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1800 8 Los Angeles, California 90067-6019 Phone: (310) 788-2400 9 Fax: (310) 788-2410

10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs SANTIAGO HOLDINGS, LLC; and SANTIAGO 11 HOLDINGS II, LLC

12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 WESTERN DIVISION 15 SANTIAGO HOLDINGS, LLC, a Case No. 2:23-cv-03172-MWF-AFM California limited liability company; 16 SANTIAGO HOLDINGS II, LLC, a Hon. Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald California limited liability company, Magistrate Judge: Hon. Alexander F. 17 MacKinnon Plaintiffs, 18 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE vs. ORDER 19 GARFIELD BEACH CVS, L.L.C., a 20 California limited liability company; CVS HEALTH CORPORATION, a State Case Filed: 03/28/2023 21 Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 Removed to Federal Court: 04/27/2023 through 10, inclusive, 22 Defendants. 23

24 25 26 27 28 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 5 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 7 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 8 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 10 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 11 in Section 12.3 (Filing Protected Material), below, that this Stipulated Protective 12 Order does not entitle them to a file confidential information under seal; Civil Local 13 Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will 14 be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 16 This action is likely to involve trade secrets and other valuable research, 17 development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for 18 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 19 than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 20 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or 21 financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or other 22 confidential research, development, or commercial information (including 23 information implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise 24 generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise 25 protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, 26 or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the 27 prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to 28 adequately protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure 1 that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in 2 preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the 3 litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is 4 justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be 5 designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated 6 without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public 7 manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this 8 case. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Action: Santiago Holdings, LLC et al v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C. 11 et al. C.D.Cal. 2:23-cv-03172-MWF-AFM. 12 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 13 designation of information or items under this Order. 14 2.3 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or 15 Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored, or maintained) or 16 tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 18 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 19 their support staff). 20 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 21 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 22 “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 24 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 25 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or 26 generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 27 28 1 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 3 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 4 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 5 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 6 counsel. 7 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or 8 other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 9 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 10 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 11 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 12 which has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 13 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 15 support staffs). 16 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 17 Discovery Material in this Action. 18 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 19 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 21 and their employees and subcontractors. 22 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 23 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 25 Material from a Producing Party. 26 27 28 1 3. SCOPE 2 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 3 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 4 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 5 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 6 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 7 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 8 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 9 10 4. DURATION 11 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 12 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 13 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Santiago Holdings, LLC v. Garfield Beach CVS, L.L.C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-holdings-llc-v-garfield-beach-cvs-llc-cacd-2023.