Santiago Gonzalez, Jr. v. Hortencia Guerra Margo
This text of Santiago Gonzalez, Jr. v. Hortencia Guerra Margo (Santiago Gonzalez, Jr. v. Hortencia Guerra Margo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice
Paul W. Green, Justice
Sarah B. Duncan, Justice
Delivered and Filed: August 25, 2004
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION
On July 13, 2004, this court notified the trial court clerk that the clerk's record was late. The trial court clerk responded to our notice by stating that the clerk's record was not filed because appellant had failed to submit a request for a clerk's record. We subsequently ordered appellant to
04-04-00197-CV
provide written proof to this court that he had filed a designation of record with the trial court clerk. We further ordered appellant to provide written proof to this court that either: (1) the clerk's fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the clerk's fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk's fee. Appellant failed to respond to our order. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b); 42.3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santiago Gonzalez, Jr. v. Hortencia Guerra Margo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santiago-gonzalez-jr-v-hortencia-guerra-margo-texapp-2004.