Santi v. Zack Co.
287 So. 2d 127, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 18, 1973·No. No. 73-164·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under [128] the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So. 2d 127, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).
287 So. 2d 127 (Santi v. Zack Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Universal Insurance Company of North America v. Sunset 102 Office Park Condominium Association, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2023
Building B1, LLC v. Component Repair Services, Inc.
224 So. 3d 785 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)
Dimick v. Ray
774 So. 2d 830 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)