Santi v. Zack Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Santi v. Zack Co.

287 So. 2d 127, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 18, 1973

DocketNo. 73-164

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 287 So. 2d 127 (Santi v. Zack Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santi v. Zack Co., 287 So. 2d 127, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under [128]*128the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The single point raised on this appeal is whether the trial judge erred in denying plaintiffs-appellants’ motion to amend the complaint during trial. The amendment sought to completely change the basis of the action. It cannot be said that under [128]*128the circumstances of this case an abuse of discretion has been shown. See Brown v. Montgomery Ward & Company, Fla.App. 1971, 252 So.2d 817.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

287 So. 2d 127, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 6149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santi-v-zack-co-fladistctapp-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack