Santen v. U. S. Shoe Co.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Santen v. U. S. Shoe Co.

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 254

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati·Decided December 9, 1924·No. No. 59064·Published

Opinion

MARX, J.

The question in this case arises upon the motion of the United States Shoe Company to quash the service made upon it by publication by Santen. It seems that Santen advertised the case pending against the Company, publishing it for 6 consecutive weeks. The grounds 'upon which the company seeks to' set aside this, service by publication were: ' ’

. 1. That there is ho authority at law for making such service by publication.

■ 2. - That said publication was not made in a newspaper printed in the County where petition was filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MARX, J.

The question in this case arises upon the motion of the United States Shoe Company to quash the service made upon it by publication by Santen. It seems that Santen advertised the case pending against the Company, publishing it for 6 consecutive weeks. The grounds 'upon which the company seeks to' set aside this, service by publication were: ' ’

. 1. That there is ho authority at law for making such service by publication.

■ 2. - That said publication was not made in a newspaper printed in the County where petition was filed.

Santen v. U. S. Shoe Co., 3 Ohio Law. Abs. 254 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1924).

Pincite

3 Ohio Law. Abs. 254 (Santen v. U. S. Shoe Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.