Santellano v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Santellano v. State

557 S.W.2d 113, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1274

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 26, 1977

DocketNo. 55878

StatusPublished

This text of 557 S.W.2d 113 (Santellano v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santellano v. State, 557 S.W.2d 113, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1274 (Tex. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION

GREEN, Commissioner.

Appellant was indicted by a Harris County grand jury for attempted burglary in violation of Art. 1402, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. (1925). The indictment alleged that the offense was committed on or about June 2, 1973. On September 21, 1976, appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court. Appellant was convicted and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for five (5) years.

The record is before us without a transcription of the court reporter’s notes and no brief has been filed in appellant’s behalf. Although there is no affidavit of indigency in the record, it does contain appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. In this motion, appellant stated that he was indigent and could not afford to retain counsel to represent him on appeal. It does not appear that this motion was ever called to the attention of the trial court for appropriate action. Under these circumstances we would ordinarily abate the appeal; however, the record on its face shows error which requires reversal.

The indictment, which was presented and filed June 19, 1973, charges appellant with the offense of attempted burglary of a house, alleged to have been committed June 2,1973. See Art. 1402, V.A.P.C. The maximum punishment authorized for that offense was four years.¹ The judgment and [114]*114sentence both recite that appellant was convicted of attempted burglary of a habitation, with punishment being assessed at five years. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sections 31.02 and 15.01, effective January 1, 1974. The indictment will not support a conviction for the offense of attempted burglary of a habitation under Sections 31.02 and 15.01 of the new Code.

Since appellant was convicted for an offense not alleged in the indictment, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

GREEN, Commissioner.

Appellant was indicted by a Harris County grand jury for attempted burglary in violation of Art. 1402, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. (1925). The indictment alleged that the offense was committed on or about June 2, 1973. On September 21, 1976, appellant waived trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty before the court. Appellant was convicted and punishment was assessed at imprisonment for five (5) years.

The record is before us without a transcription of the court reporter’s notes and no brief has been filed in appellant’s behalf. Although there is no affidavit of indigency in the record, it does contain appellant’s pro se motion for appointment of counsel on appeal. In this motion, appellant stated that he was indigent and could not afford to retain counsel to represent him on appeal. It does not appear that this motion was ever called to the attention of the trial court for appropriate action. Under these circumstances we would ordinarily abate the appeal; however, the record on its face shows error which requires reversal.

The indictment, which was presented and filed June 19, 1973, charges appellant with the offense of attempted burglary of a house, alleged to have been committed June 2,1973. See Art. 1402, V.A.P.C. The maximum punishment authorized for that offense was four years.¹ The judgment and [114]*114sentence both recite that appellant was convicted of attempted burglary of a habitation, with punishment being assessed at five years. See V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sections 31.02 and 15.01, effective January 1, 1974. The indictment will not support a conviction for the offense of attempted burglary of a habitation under Sections 31.02 and 15.01 of the new Code.

Since appellant was convicted for an offense not alleged in the indictment, the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Opinion approved by the Court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

557 S.W.2d 113, 1977 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santellano-v-state-texcrimapp-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack