Santaro v. Santaro

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santaro v. Santaro

59 A.D.2d 1038, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 4, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 59 A.D.2d 1038 (Santaro v. Santaro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santaro v. Santaro, 59 A.D.2d 1038, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal to this court denied. Memorandum: Since the order is appealable as a matter of right (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2, cl [v]), the motion seeking leave to appeal is unnecessary. However, appeals from orders granting temporary alimony are not favored. In lieu thereof, counsel should proceed promptly to trial and upon application by either party to Special Term, a preference may be obtained (see Goldstein v Goldstein, 35 AD2d 777). Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for leave to appeal to this court denied. Memorandum: Since the order is appealable as a matter of right (CPLR 5701, subd [a], par 2, cl [v]), the motion seeking leave to appeal is unnecessary. However, appeals from orders granting temporary alimony are not favored. In lieu thereof, counsel should proceed promptly to trial and upon application by either party to Special Term, a preference may be obtained (see Goldstein v Goldstein, 35 AD2d 777). Present—Marsh, P. J., Moule, Dillon and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 A.D.2d 1038, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14325, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santaro-v-santaro-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack