Santangelo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Santangelo v. State

219 So. 3d 1000, 2017 WL 2438338, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 2017

DocketCASE NO. 1D16-2086

StatusPublished

This text of 219 So. 3d 1000 (Santangelo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santangelo v. State, 219 So. 3d 1000, 2017 WL 2438338, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error contained in the probation ■ revocation order, which states that the appellant violated “Condition [] 2” of her probation rather than “Modification of Probation Condition (2).” See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error in probation revocation order.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. However, we remand for correction of the scrivener’s error contained in the probation ■ revocation order, which states that the appellant violated “Condition [] 2” of her probation rather than “Modification of Probation Condition (2).” See Nickolas v. State, 66 So.3d 1077 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s error in probation revocation order.

ROBERTS, C.J., ROWE and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 So. 3d 1000, 2017 WL 2438338, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santangelo-v-state-fladistctapp-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack