Santana v. Florida Parole Commission

118 So. 3d 962, 2013 WL 4042681, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 9, 2013
DocketNo. 1D12-4149
StatusPublished

This text of 118 So. 3d 962 (Santana v. Florida Parole Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santana v. Florida Parole Commission, 118 So. 3d 962, 2013 WL 4042681, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Consistent with the Florida Parole Commission’s concession of error, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED. The circuit court’s order denying Santana’s petition for writ of mandamus is QUASHED and this matter is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Alday v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 58 So.3d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011).

WOLF, CLARK, and RAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alday v. Florida Parole Commission
58 So. 3d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
118 So. 3d 962, 2013 WL 4042681, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 12485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-florida-parole-commission-fladistctapp-2013.