Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez
This text of Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez (Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
JUAN O. SANTANA MERAN,
Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and ROSA GONZALEZ,
Appellees.
No. 2D2024-0594
March 5, 2025
Appeal from the Department of Revenue.
Juan O. Santana Meran, pro se.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Department of Revenue.
No appearance for Appellee Rosa Gonzalez.
PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1980).
SLEET, C.J., and LaROSE and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-department-of-revenue-gonzalez-fladistctapp-2025.