Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 5, 2025
Docket2D2024-0594
StatusPublished

This text of Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez (Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

JUAN O. SANTANA MERAN,

Appellant,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and ROSA GONZALEZ,

Appellees.

No. 2D2024-0594

March 5, 2025

Appeal from the Department of Revenue.

Juan O. Santana Meran, pro se.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah C. Prieto, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, for Appellee Department of Revenue.

No appearance for Appellee Rosa Gonzalez.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1980).

SLEET, C.J., and LaROSE and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Santana v. Department of Revenue, Gonzalez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-department-of-revenue-gonzalez-fladistctapp-2025.