Santana v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Santana v. City of New York

266 A.D.2d 134, 698 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12335

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 30, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 134 (Santana v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santana v. City of New York, 266 A.D.2d 134, 698 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12335 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1998, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment since the documentary and testimonial evidence establish the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant-appellant was. an entity related to the Tenants Association, which allegedly managed the building at the time the fire in question occurred (Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Phyllis Gangel-Jacob, J.), entered on or about May 20, 1998, which denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly denied defendant-appellant’s motion for summary judgment since the documentary and testimonial evidence establish the existence of a triable issue of fact as to whether defendant-appellant was. an entity related to the Tenants Association, which allegedly managed the building at the time the fire in question occurred (Friends of Animals v Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 NY2d 1065). Concur — Ellerin, P. J., Williams, Lerner, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 134, 698 N.Y.S.2d 481, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack