Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Santana v. City of Hartford

Santana v. City of Hartford

901 A.2d 1223, 279 Conn. 901, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 258
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 22, 2006
DocketSC 17687
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 901 A.2d 1223 (Santana v. City of Hartford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santana v. City of Hartford, 901 A.2d 1223, 279 Conn. 901, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 258 (Colo. 2006).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 445 (AC 25994), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the plaintiffs rights to due process under the state and federal constitutions were violated under the facts of this case?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[902]*902The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17687. Kimball Haines Hunt and Nicole L. Barber, in support of the petition. Helen Apostolidis, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. Decided June 22, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Santana v. City of Hartford
918 A.2d 267 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
901 A.2d 1223, 279 Conn. 901, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-city-of-hartford-conn-2006.