Santana v. City of Hartford

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Santana v. City of Hartford

901 A.2d 1223, 279 Conn. 901, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 258

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 22, 2006·No. SC 17687·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 445 (AC 25994), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the plaintiffs rights to due process under the state and federal constitutions were violated under the facts of this case?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[902]*902The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17687. Kimball Haines Hunt and Nicole L. Barber, in support of the petition. Helen Apostolidis, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. Decided June 22, 2006

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 94 Conn. App. 445 (AC 25994), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Whether the plaintiffs rights to due process under the state and federal constitutions were violated under the facts of this case?”

PALMER, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

[902]*902The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17687. Kimball Haines Hunt and Nicole L. Barber, in support of the petition. Helen Apostolidis, assistant corporation counsel, in opposition. Decided June 22, 2006

Santana v. City of Hartford, 901 A.2d 1223, 279 Conn. 901, 2006 Conn. LEXIS 258 (Colo. 2006).

Pincite

901 A.2d 1223 (Santana v. City of Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related