Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Santana v. Acosta

Santana v. Acosta

12 A.D.3d 282, 784 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14149
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 23, 2004
StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.3d 282 (Santana v. Acosta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Santana v. Acosta, 12 A.D.3d 282, 784 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14149 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Janice L. Bowman, J.), entered May 1, 2003, which granted plaintiff’s motion to amend the ad damnum clause of the complaint and to transfer the action from Civil Court, Bronx County, to Supreme Court, Bronx County, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

“[I]n the absence of prejudice to the defendant, a motion to amend the ad damnum clause . . . should generally be granted” (Loomis v Civetta Corinno Constr. Corp., 54 NY2d 18, 23 [1981]). Defendants show no prejudice. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Williams, Friedman, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Loomis v. Civetta Corinno Construction Corp.
429 N.E.2d 90 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 A.D.3d 282, 784 N.Y.S.2d 860, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santana-v-acosta-nyappdiv-2004.