Santana Energy Services LLC v. Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc., Smith International, Inc. and Coil Tubing Services, LLC.
Opinion
Opinion issued October 15, 2013
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-13-00042-CV ——————————— SANTANA ENERGY SERVICES, LLC, Appellant V. PATHFINDER ENERGY SERVICES, INC., SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC., AND COIL TUBING SERVICES, LLC, Appellees
On Appeal from the 215th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2009-61939
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Santana Energy Services, LLC, has neither paid the required fees
nor established indigence for purposes of appellate costs. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5,
20.1; see also TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.941(a), 101.041 (West 2013);
Order Regarding Fees Charged in Civil Cases in the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeals and Before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, Misc. Docket
No. 07-9138 (Tex. Aug. 28, 2007), reprinted in TEX. R. APP. P. app. A § B(1).
After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant did not
respond. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5; 42.3(c).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for nonpayment of all required fees. We
dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Higley, and Massengale.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santana Energy Services LLC v. Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc., Smith International, Inc. and Coil Tubing Services, LLC. (Santana Energy Services LLC v. Pathfinder Energy Services, Inc., Smith International, Inc. and Coil Tubing Services, LLC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.