Santa Rosa County School Board v. Howard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Santa Rosa County School Board v. Howard

745 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16881

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 16, 1999

DocketNo. 98—4010

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 745 So. 2d 1132 (Santa Rosa County School Board v. Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santa Rosa County School Board v. Howard, 745 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16881 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Santa Rosa County School Board and Sewell, Todd & Broxton (jointly the em[1133]*1133ployer/carrier), appeal a workers’ compensation order denying the employer/carrier a recoupment of the overpayment of benefits resulting from the application of an offset under Escambia County Sheriff’s Dep’t v. Grice, 692 So.2d 896 (Fla.1997). The employer/carrier sought recoupment for the amount they overpaid before they asserted the right to take such an offset. Given our recent opinion in HRS District II et al. v. Pickard, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1749, D2368, — So.2d -, -, 1999 WL 503456 (Fla. 1st DCA July 19, 1999), the order is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of an order allowing a retroactive Grice offset and re-coupment only for the period between May 1,1997 and September 8,1997.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

LAWRENCE, DAVIS AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Santa Rosa County School Board and Sewell, Todd & Broxton (jointly the em[1133]*1133ployer/carrier), appeal a workers’ compensation order denying the employer/carrier a recoupment of the overpayment of benefits resulting from the application of an offset under Escambia County Sheriff’s Dep’t v. Grice, 692 So.2d 896 (Fla.1997). The employer/carrier sought recoupment for the amount they overpaid before they asserted the right to take such an offset. Given our recent opinion in HRS District II et al. v. Pickard, 24 Fla. L. Weekly D1749, D2368, — So.2d -, -, 1999 WL 503456 (Fla. 1st DCA July 19, 1999), the order is affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for entry of an order allowing a retroactive Grice offset and re-coupment only for the period between May 1,1997 and September 8,1997.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

LAWRENCE, DAVIS AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 So. 2d 1132, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 16881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santa-rosa-county-school-board-v-howard-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack