Santa Rosa BBFH, Inc. v. Island Echos Condominium Ass'n
Opinion
The order of the trial judge entered August 17, 1981 is affirmed. Rule 1.220(b), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure (1977), republished in 1980 as Rule 1.221.1 The trial court’s entry of summary judgment based on its construction of the declaration is proper and can be sustained on a number of grounds. First, on the record, the equities are with Island Echos Condominium Association. See Welch v. Point of Americas Condominium Apartments, 378 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). Second, any ambiguity in a declaration of condominium is to be construed against the author of the declaration, i.e., the developer. See, Kaufman v. Shere, 347 So.2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977).
Our affirmance does not extend to the issue raised by Mutual Federal Savings and Loan Association concerning the validity of its mortgage upon the leasehold interest in Unit 1-G. That issue was not addressed in, nor resolved by, the order of summary judgment and is still pending before the trial court for further consideration.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
421 So. 2d 534 (Santa Rosa BBFH, Inc. v. Island Echos Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.