Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne
267 F. 656, 50 App. D.C. 98, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2222
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne. Read the opinion of the Court — 267 F. 653 →
Opinion
The facts in this case do not differ materially from those in the preceding ease, No. 3340, between the same parties. 50 App. D. C.-, 267 Fed. 653. Our decision here, therefore, must be the same as in. that case, and accordingly the decree appealed from is affirmed, with costs.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne, 267 F. 656, 50 App. D.C. 98, 1920 U.S. App. LEXIS 2222 (D.D.C. 1920).
267 F. 656 (Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Santa Fé Pac. R. v. Payne
267 F. 653 (District of Columbia, 1920)