Santa Cruz County v. Earhart
This text of 177 P. 270 (Santa Cruz County v. Earhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arizona Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellee served appellant county as its treasurer during the years 1915 and 1916. He was paid an annual [142]*142salary of $1,800 as provided in paragraph 3236, Civil Code of 1913. He claims he was entitled to a salary of $2,200, as provided in paragraph 2611, Revised Statutes of 1901. His complaint was filed March 31, 1917.
•The answer did not interpose the plea of the one-year statute of limitations, and, as a consequence, we have nothing to do but affirm the judgment. Chapter 80, Laws of 1917, did not take effect until a long time after this action was commenced. Santa Cruz County v. McKnight, ante, p. 103, 177 Pac. 256, just decided; Yuma County v. Hodges, post, p. 142, 177 Pac. 270, just decided.
CUNNINGHAM, C. J., and JOHN WILSON ROSS, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 P. 270, 20 Ariz. 141, 1919 Ariz. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santa-cruz-county-v-earhart-ariz-1919.