Santa Cruz County v. Earhart

177 P. 270, 20 Ariz. 141, 1919 Ariz. LEXIS 133
Arizona Supreme Court·Decided January 3, 1919·No. Civil No. 1603·Published

Opinion

ROSS, J.

Appellee served appellant county as its treasurer during the years 1915 and 1916. He was paid an annual [142]*142salary of $1,800 as provided in paragraph 3236, Civil Code of 1913. He claims he was entitled to a salary of $2,200, as provided in paragraph 2611, Revised Statutes of 1901. His complaint was filed March 31, 1917.

•The answer did not interpose the plea of the one-year statute of limitations, and, as a consequence, we have nothing to do but affirm the judgment. Chapter 80, Laws of 1917, did not take effect until a long time after this action was commenced. Santa Cruz County v. McKnight, ante, p. 103, 177 Pac. 256, just decided; Yuma County v. Hodges, post, p. 142, 177 Pac. 270, just decided.

CUNNINGHAM, C. J., and JOHN WILSON ROSS, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santa Cruz County v. Earhart, 177 P. 270, 20 Ariz. 141, 1919 Ariz. LEXIS 133 (Ark. 1919).

177 P. 270 (Santa Cruz County v. Earhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santa Cruz County v. McKnight
177 P. 256 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1918)
Yuma County v. Hodges
177 P. 270 (Arizona Supreme Court, 1919)