Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co. v. Board of Supervisors
12 P. 129, 71 Cal. 268, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 571
This text of 12 P. 129 (Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co. v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Santa Clara Valley Mill & Lumber Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 12 P. 129, 71 Cal. 268, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 571 (Cal. 1886).
Opinion
The clerk had no authority to enter the judgment for costs while a motion to retax was pending. (Riddell v. Harrell, No. 11363, ante, p. 254.)
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Chastain v. Crossfield
11 P.2d 1011 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1932)
Kelling v. Brooks
275 P. 1077 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1929)
Huey v. Starr
101 P. 1075 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1909)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
12 P. 129, 71 Cal. 268, 1886 Cal. LEXIS 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santa-clara-valley-mill-lumber-co-v-board-of-supervisors-cal-1886.