Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.

295 P. 866, 111 Cal. App. 564
California Court of Appeal·Decided February 4, 1931·No. Docket No. 7232.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages in a condemnation suit brought for the condemnation of a street for a public road. Almost all or both of appellant's briefs consist of comparison or weighing of the evidence of values given, as to the values of the lands to be taken, and the damage to the defendants, by reason of severance.

[1] The only assignments of error made in appellant's opening brief are: First, that the evidence dos not sustain *Page 565 the verdict, and second, that the compensation awarded respondent is excessive.

If there is any evidence to sustain the awards we cannot weigh the evidence. There is in the record sufficient evidence to sustain the awards of the jury in this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Conrey, P.J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co., 295 P. 866, 111 Cal. App. 564 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

295 P. 866 (Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

County of San Diego v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n
286 P.2d 880 (California Court of Appeal, 1955)