Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.

California Court of Appeal

Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.

295 P. 866, 111 Cal. App. 564

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 4, 1931

DocketDocket No. 7232.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 295 P. 866 (Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co., 295 P. 866, 111 Cal. App. 564 (Cal. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages in a condemnation suit brought for the condemnation of a street for a public road. Almost all or both of appellant's briefs consist of comparison or weighing of the evidence of values given, as to the values of the lands to be taken, and the damage to the defendants, by reason of severance.

[1] The only assignments of error made in appellant's opening brief are: First, that the evidence dos not sustain *Page 565 the verdict, and second, that the compensation awarded respondent is excessive.

If there is any evidence to sustain the awards we cannot weigh the evidence. There is in the record sufficient evidence to sustain the awards of the jury in this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Conrey, P.J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI