SANSOUCIE v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

SANSOUCIE v. State

306 S.W.3d 194, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 314, 2010 WL 933340

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 16, 2010

DocketED 92873

StatusPublished

This text of 306 S.W.3d 194 (SANSOUCIE v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SANSOUCIE v. State, 306 S.W.3d 194, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 314, 2010 WL 933340 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Sansoucie appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Amended Motion under Rule 29.15 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of the post-conviction motion was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Raymond Sansoucie appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Amended Motion under Rule 29.15 1 to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude the motion court’s denial of the post-conviction motion was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b) (2009).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2009, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.W.3d 194, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 314, 2010 WL 933340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sansoucie-v-state-moctapp-2010.