Sansone v. Hudnall

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sansone v. Hudnall

428 S.W.3d 692, 2014 WL 1379577, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 398

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 8, 2014·No. No. WD 76238·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Hudnall appeals a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Platte County, which addressed his claim for an attorney’s lien in connection with a dissolution proceeding. Hudnall contends that the circuit court erred: by failing to reduce his lien to a final judgment for a sum certain; by requiring that the payments by the [693] judgment debtor to which his lien attaches be made jointly to Hudnall and his former client, Elaina Sansone (formerly Elaina Fulton); and by not awarding Hudnall pre-judgment interest. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

William Hudnall appeals a judgment entered by the Circuit Court of Platte County, which addressed his claim for an attorney’s lien in connection with a dissolution proceeding. Hudnall contends that the circuit court erred: by failing to reduce his lien to a final judgment for a sum certain; by requiring that the payments by the [693] judgment debtor to which his lien attaches be made jointly to Hudnall and his former client, Elaina Sansone (formerly Elaina Fulton); and by not awarding Hudnall pre-judgment interest. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Sansone v. Hudnall, 428 S.W.3d 692, 2014 WL 1379577, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 398 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

428 S.W.3d 692 (Sansone v. Hudnall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.