Sansom v. . Johnson
This text of 193 S.E. 272 (Sansom v. . Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The ruling of the court below must be affirmed in accordance with the decisions of this Court in Williams v. Whitaker, 110 N. C., 393; Hinnant v. Wilder, 122 N. C., 149, and Wilson v. Lumber Co., 131 N. C., 163.
The amount assessed in the partition proceeding against the share of Joe T. Warren for one-seventh of the costs of the proceeding was not a personal judgment upon which an allotment of a homestead could be based, and the allotment being invalid, the lien of the docketed judgments was lost by lapse of ten years from the date of docketing the judgments. Pasour v. Rhyne, 82 N. C., 149; Lyon v. Russ, 84 N. C., 588; Lytle v. Lytle, 94 N. C., 683; Hyman v. Jones, 205 N. C., 266.
Jiidgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 S.E. 272, 212 N.C. 383, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 328, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sansom-v-johnson-nc-1937.