Sansocie v. Laclede Gas Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Sansocie v. Laclede Gas Co.

930 S.W.2d 66, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 1996 WL 453426

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 13, 1996

DocketNo. 69202

StatusPublished

This text of 930 S.W.2d 66 (Sansocie v. Laclede Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sansocie v. Laclede Gas Co., 930 S.W.2d 66, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 1996 WL 453426 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Melvin Sansoeie appeals from an award of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission granting Mr. Sansoeie permanent partial disability and temporary total disability benefits. Mr. Sansoeie asserts error in: (a) the Commission’s finding that no causal relationship existed between Mr. Sansocie’s work-related injury and his subsequent development of angina and hypertension; (b) the Commission’s finding that Mr. Sansoeie was not permanently and totally disabled; and (c) the failure of the Commission to award temporary total disability benefits for the period of July 25,1990 to August 1,1991.

We have reviewed the record and find the Commission’s award was supported by substantial and competent evidence and was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Strate v. Al Baker’s Restaurant, 864 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo.App.1993). A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Melvin Sansoeie appeals from an award of the Labor Industrial Relations Commission granting Mr. Sansoeie permanent partial disability and temporary total disability benefits. Mr. Sansoeie asserts error in: (a) the Commission’s finding that no causal relationship existed between Mr. Sansocie’s work-related injury and his subsequent development of angina and hypertension; (b) the Commission’s finding that Mr. Sansoeie was not permanently and totally disabled; and (c) the failure of the Commission to award temporary total disability benefits for the period of July 25,1990 to August 1,1991.

We have reviewed the record and find the Commission’s award was supported by substantial and competent evidence and was not contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Strate v. Al Baker’s Restaurant, 864 S.W.2d 417, 419 (Mo.App.1993). A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information explaining the reasons for this order. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

930 S.W.2d 66, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 1418, 1996 WL 453426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sansocie-v-laclede-gas-co-moctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack