Sans Souci Park ex rel. Fried v. Anderson

202 Ill. App. 118
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedNovember 27, 1916
DocketGen. No. 22,423
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 202 Ill. App. 118 (Sans Souci Park ex rel. Fried v. Anderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sans Souci Park ex rel. Fried v. Anderson, 202 Ill. App. 118 (Ill. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice MoSurely

delivered the opinion of the court..

2. Landlord and tenant, § 221*—when tenant liable for cost of removing structure. A lessee who had erected a structure on premises devised under a written lease, not providing for the erection, held liable to the lessor for money expended by him in removing the structure at the termination of the tenancy. 3. Trial, § 83*—when not abuse of discretion to reopen case. Where, after the plaintiff and the defendant had apparently rested, the court allowed the plaintiff, on his request, to introduce further testimony, held that there was no abuse of discretion in so doing. 4. Account stated, § 25*—when proof of individual items unnecessary. Where a statement of account of the plaintiff against the defendant was shown to the defendant who agreed to its correctness and promised to pay the amount at a later date, held that it was not necessary that the plaintiff, in order to recover, should introduce evidence in detail as to the various items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Stinger
269 Ill. App. 224 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 Ill. App. 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sans-souci-park-ex-rel-fried-v-anderson-illappct-1916.