Sans Souci LLC v. Lord and Taylor ECOMM LLC
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.: CV 24-02288-AB (BFMx) Date: May 9, 2024
Title: Sans Souci LLC v. Lord and Taylor ECOMM LLC et al
Present: The Honorable ANDRE BIROTTE JR., United States District Judge Carla Badirian N/A Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s): Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s): None Appearing None Appearing
Proceedings: [In Chambers] Order To Show Cause Re: Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, 1n writing, on or before May 23, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. K) Defendant(s) Saadia Group LLC; NY and Co Ecomm LLC did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff(s) have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (12/02) CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL Initials of Deputy Clerk CB
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sans Souci LLC v. Lord and Taylor ECOMM LLC (Sans Souci LLC v. Lord and Taylor ECOMM LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.