Sanossian v. Valley Stream Central High School District

• Court: District Court, E.D. New York
• Decided: March 31, 2022
• Docket: 2:16-cv-04697
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FILED -------------------------------------------------------------X For Online Publication Only CLERK CECILIA SANOSSIAN, 10:21 am, Ma r 31, 2022

Plaintiff, U.S. DISTRICT COURT ORDER EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK LONG ISLAND OFFICE -against- 16-CV-4697 JMA) (ARL)

VALLEY STREAM CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Defendant. -------------------------------------------------------------X AZRACK, United States District Judge: Currently pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 90.) In a Report and Recommendation issued on February 16, 2022 (the “R&R”), Magistrate Judge Shields recommended granting Defendant’s motion. In reviewing a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation, the court must “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or . . . recommendations to which objection[s][are] made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C); see also Brown v. Ebert, No. 05–CV–5579, --------------- 2006 WL 3851152, at *2 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 29, 2006). The court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). Those portions of a report and recommendation to which there is no specific reasoned objection are reviewed for clear error. See Pall Corp. v. Entegris, Inc., 249 F.R.D. 48, 51 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). To date, no objections have been filed to the R&R and the deadline for filing any such objections has passed. I have reviewed the R&R for clear error, and finding none, I adopt the R&R in its entirety as the opinion of this Court. Accordingly, Defendant’s motion for summary is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 31, 2022 Central Islip, New York

/s/ (JMA) JOAN M. AZRACK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE