Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation

300 A.D.2d 93, 750 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola Soto, J.), entered August 7, 2002, directing petitioner’s compliance with respondent Department of Investigation’s (DOI) subpoena within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After an in camera review of the confidential materials submitted by DOI to the motion court, we find that DOI made a threshold showing that the underlying complaint is authentic, that it is of sufficient substance to warrant investigation and that the documents sought, including those that pertain to petitioner’s nonmunicipal contracts, are relevant to that investigation (Matter of New York City Dept. of Investigation v Passannante, 148 AD2d 101, 105). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation, 300 A.D.2d 93, 750 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

300 A.D.2d 93 (Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New York City Department of Investigation v. Passannante
148 A.D.2d 101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)