Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation

300 A.D.2d 93, 750 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 300 A.D.2d 93 (Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sano Construction Corp. v. City of New York Department of Investigation, 300 A.D.2d 93, 750 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola Soto, J.), entered August 7, 2002, directing petitioner’s compliance with respondent Department of Investigation’s (DOI) subpoena within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After an in camera review of the confidential materials submitted by DOI to the motion court, we find that DOI made a threshold showing that the underlying complaint is authentic, that it is of sufficient substance to warrant investigation and that the documents sought, including those that pertain to petitioner’s nonmunicipal contracts, are relevant to that investigation (Matter of New York City Dept. of Investigation v Passannante, 148 AD2d 101, 105). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola Soto, J.), entered August 7, 2002, directing petitioner’s compliance with respondent Department of Investigation’s (DOI) subpoena within 30 days, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

After an in camera review of the confidential materials submitted by DOI to the motion court, we find that DOI made a threshold showing that the underlying complaint is authentic, that it is of sufficient substance to warrant investigation and that the documents sought, including those that pertain to petitioner’s nonmunicipal contracts, are relevant to that investigation (Matter of New York City Dept. of Investigation v Passannante, 148 AD2d 101, 105). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Mazzarelli, Buckley and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 93, 750 N.Y.S.2d 848, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sano-construction-corp-v-city-of-new-york-department-of-investigation-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack