Sanmartin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Sanmartin v. State

571 So. 2d 6, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3025, 1990 WL 57822

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 2, 1990

DocketNo. 90-00922

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 571 So. 2d 6 (Sanmartin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sanmartin v. State, 571 So. 2d 6, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3025, 1990 WL 57822 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s pro se petition for return of property, which we have treated as the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief. The trial court’s order is affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking relief after his direct appeal [7]*7has been decided. See Marshall v. State, 481 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s pro se petition for return of property, which we have treated as the summary denial of a motion for postconviction relief. The trial court’s order is affirmed without prejudice to appellant seeking relief after his direct appeal [7]*7has been decided. See Marshall v. State, 481 So.2d 973 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).

RYDER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

571 So. 2d 6, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3025, 1990 WL 57822, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanmartin-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack