Sankey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Sankey v. State

306 S.E.2d 357, 167 Ga. App. 224, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3316

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 29, 1983

Docket66103

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 306 S.E.2d 357 (Sankey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sankey v. State, 306 S.E.2d 357, 167 Ga. App. 224, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3316 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

*224 Shulman, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. In Count 1 he was charged with a single sale of marijuana and in Count 2 he was charged with possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with intent to distribute. Appellant’s only enumeration of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence.

At trial an investigating officer testified that, acting on a series of complaints, he purchased a “nick” (a five-dollar bag of marijuana) from appellant. The officer also stated that he later returned to appellant’s apartment with a search warrant and discovered a brown paper bag containing approximately four ounces of marijuana, two sets of scales, and a box of manila envelopes of the same type used to purchase the “nick.” The State Crime Lab chemist testified that the contraband tested positive for marijuana. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also Wright v. State, 154 Ga. App. 400 (1) (268 SE2d 378).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*224 Shulman, Chief Judge.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of violation of the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. In Count 1 he was charged with a single sale of marijuana and in Count 2 he was charged with possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with intent to distribute. Appellant’s only enumeration of error questions the sufficiency of the evidence.

At trial an investigating officer testified that, acting on a series of complaints, he purchased a “nick” (a five-dollar bag of marijuana) from appellant. The officer also stated that he later returned to appellant’s apartment with a search warrant and discovered a brown paper bag containing approximately four ounces of marijuana, two sets of scales, and a box of manila envelopes of the same type used to purchase the “nick.” The State Crime Lab chemist testified that the contraband tested positive for marijuana. We are satisfied that the evidence produced at trial was sufficient to authorize any rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes charged. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560); Baldwin v. State, 153 Ga. App. 35, 37 (264 SE2d 528). See also Wright v. State, 154 Ga. App. 400 (1) (268 SE2d 378).

Judgment affirmed.

McMurray, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

306 S.E.2d 357, 167 Ga. App. 224, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 3316, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sankey-v-state-gactapp-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack