Sanjines v. Ortwein & Assoc.

CourtTennessee Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 21, 1998
Docket03S01-9712-CV-00139
StatusPublished

This text of Sanjines v. Ortwein & Assoc. (Sanjines v. Ortwein & Assoc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Tennessee Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sanjines v. Ortwein & Assoc., (Tenn. 1998).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE FILED December 21, 1998 JORGE ARIEL SANJINES ) Appeal ) No. 03-S-01-9712-CV-00139 Cecil W. Crowson Plaintiff-Appellee ) ) Appellate Court Clerk v. ) Hamilton County ) No. 96-CV-0347 ORTWEIN AND ASSOCIATES, P.C., ) WILLIAM H. ORTWEIN, and ) J. CRIS HELTON ) Judgment of the Court of ) Appeals is REVERSED Defendants-Appellants )

JUDGMENT ORDER

This cause came to be heard upon the briefs, argument of

counsel, and the record on appeal from the Court of Appeals.

The Court is of the opinion that under the facts of this

case, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to

grant the appellee a stay of the legal malpractice case during the

pendency of the post-conviction matter alleging ineffective

assistance of counsel. In accordance with the opinion filed

herewith, it is therefore, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED by this Court that

the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed.

Costs of the appeal are taxed against the appellee, for

which execution may issue if necessary.

12/21/98

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sanjines v. Ortwein & Assoc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sanjines-v-ortwein-assoc-tenn-1998.